In 1843, an English landowner named John Bennet Lawes marked out a wheat field on his estate in Hertfordshire and began testing what happens when the same crop is grown on the same land, year after year, under different combinations of fertilizer.

The experiment is called Broadbalk. It is still running today, on the same field, making it the oldest continuously running agricultural experiment in the world. One narrow strip of Broadbalk has received no fertilizer and no manure of any kind since the very first year, 1843, a control against which every other treatment is compared.

Aerial-level view of the Broadbalk wheat field at Rothamsted, showing distinct rectangular strips of wheat with visibly different growth due to different fertilizer histories
The Broadbalk field today. Nearly two centuries of different fertilizer treatments have produced visibly different strips of wheat, still growing side by side in the same field.

Photo: Michael Trolove, Geograph, CC BY-SA 2.0.

What do you think has happened to that untreated strip's wheat yield over more than 180 years with zero fertilizer input?

Running case: the Broadbalk Wheat Experiment
  • Started 1843 by John Bennet Lawes at Rothamsted, Hertfordshire, UK; still running today, the world's oldest continuous agricultural experiment.
  • Tests combinations of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and organic manure on continuous winter wheat, with fertilizer nitrogen rates historically ranging from 0 to 288 kg per hectare across plots.
  • The unfertilized, unmanured control strip has yielded roughly 1 tonne of wheat per hectare for well over a century, low but remarkably stable.
  • Soil and plant samples have been archived continuously since the 1840s, letting scientists compare soil from the same plot across nearly two centuries.

Figures from Rothamsted Research and the Electronic Rothamsted Archive (e-RA).

5.1.1

Soil is a dynamic system

Soil is a resource for life, and it varies enormously from place to place, but every soil is a dynamic system in the same sense any ecosystem is: it exists within a larger ecosystem, and it has its own inputs, outputs, storages and flows. Matter and energy enter it, move through it, are stored in it for a while, and eventually leave it.

Broadbalk's untreated strip demonstrates exactly this. Even with no human input, matter keeps entering and leaving the system, so it settles into a new balance rather than running down to nothing. Understanding soil starts with treating it as a system, not a static substance sitting under a lawn.

5.1.2

What soil is made of

Soil is a complex mixture of interacting components, not a single substance. It combines inorganic components (mineral matter: rock fragments, sand, silt and clay produced by weathering of the parent rock) with organic components (living soil organisms and material from the decay of dead organisms), plus water and air filling the spaces between particles.

Pie chart showing soil composition split roughly in half between pore space (water and air) and solids (mineral components such as sand, silt and clay, plus a smaller share of organic material)
Soil is typically about half pore space (water and air, in varying proportions) and half solids. Within the solid half, mineral particles dominate, with organic material a small but disproportionately important remainder. Real soils vary widely around these figures.

Diagram: JasonHS, CC BY-SA 4.0.

5.1.3

A layered structure: the soil profile

Over long periods of time, interactions within the soil system produce a stable, layered structure called a profile, made up of distinct horizons. Profiles typically transition from more organic material near the surface to more mineral material below. The full set of horizons, and how to read a profile diagram, is covered in the HL Extension tab.

5.1.4-5.1.7

How matter moves into, out of and within soil

Four kinds of process keep a soil system in motion. Inputs add matter from outside the system: dead organic matter (litter, dead animal biomass, manure) and inorganic minerals (weathering, precipitation, dust, or in managed systems, fertilizer and irrigation). Outputs remove matter from the system: decomposition losses, erosion, nutrient uptake by plant roots, leaching, and evaporation. Transfers move matter across horizons or into and out of the soil without changing what it is, such as infiltration and percolation of water, or erosion carrying particles away. Transformations change what the matter actually is, such as decomposition breaking litter into simpler compounds, or weathering turning rock into mineral particles.

Sort each process into the category it belongs to.

Input
Output
Transfer
Transformation
🛠Application of skills

Build your own systems flow diagram of the soil ecosystem, showing inputs, processes and outputs, in the Skills tab.

5.1.9

Soil as a growth medium

Soil provides the foundation of terrestrial ecosystems as a medium for plant growth: it acts as a seed bank, a store of water, and a store of almost all the essential nutrients plants need, especially nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. Carbon is the one major exception. Plants get their carbon from the atmosphere, through photosynthesis, not from the soil.

Which nutrient do plants mainly obtain from the atmosphere rather than from soil?

5.1.10

A habitat most of us never see

Soil contributes enormously to biodiversity by providing a habitat and a niche for an immense range of species: microorganisms, animals and fungi, many of them still undescribed by science. A single teaspoon of healthy soil can contain up to a billion bacteria, several yards of fungal filaments, and thousands of protozoa, more living organisms than there are people on Earth, packed into a volume smaller than a sugar cube.

Soil supports such an immense range of species partly because it provides each organism with a habitat and something else. What is that second thing?

5.1.11

Recycling nutrients

Soil plays a central role in recycling elements as part of the planet's biogeochemical cycles. The major input is dead organic matter from plants. Click the steps below in the order this recycling actually happens.

    Apply your knowledge: two more soil systems

    Challenge 1

    Transfer test. A fertilized Broadbalk plot has received exactly the same treatment, the same amount of the same fertilizer, every single year since the 1850s. Yet its wheat yield still varies noticeably from year to year rather than staying perfectly constant. Using the concept of soil as a dynamic system, explain why yield still varies even when the controlled input never changes.

    Your explanation

    Challenge 2 · Extension

    An old-growth forest a few kilometers from Broadbalk has never been fertilized, plowed or fertilized by anyone, yet its soil has supported dense tree cover for centuries without collapsing the way an over-farmed field can. Explain why this unmanaged forest soil system does not need constant human inputs to remain stable, using ideas from this tab.

    Your explanation

    Challenge 3 · Evaluate the evidence

    Broadbalk's own long-run data is the strongest evaluate-level evidence on this page: two treatments that reach a similar yield by very different routes, and a control that shows what happens with no input at all. The three scenarios below use those real figures to test evaluate-level reasoning, not just recall.

    Where the numbers come from: long-run Broadbalk results (about 1.0 t/ha unfertilized, about 4.9 t/ha on mineral fertilizer, about 4.8 t/ha on organic manure, 1950–2019 averages). The "soil health index" referenced below is a teaching stand-in, not one published number, but the direction it moves is real: manured plots build up soil structure that mineral-only plots don't, even at the same yield.

    Long-run Broadbalk averages: about 4.9 t/ha on mineral fertilizer, about 4.8 t/ha on farmyard manure, about 1.0 t/ha with no treatment. Manured plots also build up soil organic matter and structure that mineral-only plots do not, even at a similar yield. Which conclusion is best supported by comparing the two fertilized treatments?

    A student writes: "No-treatment plots are simply worse, because they yield less." Why is this an incomplete evaluate-level answer?

    Broadbalk's yield averages are measured field data collected since 1843. The "soil health index" comparing treatments is described on this page as an illustrative teaching stand-in. In a written evaluate answer, how should these two be treated?

    IB link

    This is the shape of an "evaluate" or "discuss" question: two real outcomes, two things you might value differently, no single right answer. Naming the trade-off explicitly, similar yield against better long-term soil health, is what separates a describe-level answer from an evaluate-level one.

    Sources: this tab
    • Rothamsted Research and the Electronic Rothamsted Archive (e-RA): the Broadbalk Wheat Experiment, continuous since 1843.
    • Broadbalk field photo: Michael Trolove, Geograph, CC BY-SA 2.0.
    • Soil composition by pore space and solids: JasonHS, CC BY-SA 4.0, cross-checked against standard soil science reference figures.
    • Soil microbial abundance (up to a billion bacteria per teaspoon of soil): widely cited soil biology figures, consistent across multiple soil science sources.
    • Broadbalk long-run yield averages by treatment (mineral fertilizer ≈ 4.9 t/ha, farmyard manure ≈ 4.8 t/ha, unfertilized control ≈ 1.0 t/ha, 1950-2019) and the recorded peak yield of 13.8 t/ha (2014): e-RA Broadbalk datasets. Manure-vs-mineral soil organic matter finding: Down To Earth coverage of Rothamsted results.
    • IB Environmental Systems and Societies Guide, first assessment 2026, Topic 5, Subtopic 5.1, statements 5.1.1-5.1.11.
    5.1.12

    Soil texture

    Soil texture defines the physical make-up of the mineral portion of soil. It depends on the relative proportions of sand, silt, clay and humus it contains. Sand particles are the largest and feel gritty; silt particles are medium-sized and feel smooth, almost like flour; clay particles are the smallest, sticky when wet, and pack tightly together. Texture can be determined with a simple feel test, or more precisely in a laboratory by mixing a sample with water and letting the particles settle into layers by size.

    The full sand/silt/clay classification triangle, used to name a soil's exact texture class, is in the HL Extension tab.

    A student rubs a moist soil sample between their fingers and finds it smooth, almost like flour, with no grittiness and no stickiness. Which particle size dominates the sample?

    5.1.13

    Texture and productivity

    A soil's texture strongly influences how productive it can be, through three competing effects: how well it retains nutrients versus how easily nutrients leach away, how well it retains water versus how freely it drains, and how well it aerates versus how easily it becomes compacted or waterlogged. Humus, the dark, crumbly product of partially decayed plant material, contributes disproportionately to a soil's texture wherever it is abundant. Click each soil type below to see how it behaves.

    Illustration comparing sand, silt and clay soils under rainfall: sand drains quickly with large breathable pores and is drought-sensitive, silt is well-drained but holds moisture, clay is high in nutrients but has restricted water and air flow and can waterlog
    How particle size changes a soil's behavior under the same rainfall: sand (left) drains fastest and driest, clay (right) holds the most water and nutrients but drains and aerates poorly.

    Illustration: Kaerii, CC BY-SA 4.0.

    Sandy soil
    Large particles, large gaps between them
    NutrientsPoor retention; nutrients leach through quickly with draining water.
    WaterDrains fast and freely; holds little water for plants to draw on.
    AerationWell aerated; the large gaps between particles let air move freely.
    Net effect on productivityOften nutrient-poor and drought-prone unless irrigated and fertilized regularly.
    5.1.14

    Soil as a carbon sink, store or source

    Soils can act as a carbon sink (absorbing more carbon than they release), a store (holding carbon at a roughly steady level) or a source (releasing more carbon than they absorb), depending on the relative rates of dead organic matter input and decomposition. When input outpaces decomposition, carbon accumulates. When decomposition outpaces input, stored carbon is released, mostly as carbon dioxide.

    Common misconception

    Tropical rainforest soils, despite supporting the most plant biomass of any biome on Earth, are relatively carbon-poor. Tundra, wetland and temperate grassland soils, despite supporting far less visible plant life, typically store much more carbon in the ground. The reason is decomposition rate, not how much life is growing.

    In the tropics, heat and moisture keep decomposers extremely active, so dead organic matter is broken down and its nutrients recycled back into living plants within weeks. Almost all of the ecosystem's carbon stays locked in standing biomass rather than accumulating in the soil. In cold or waterlogged environments, tundra, peat wetlands and temperate grasslands, decomposition is slow: low temperatures or a lack of oxygen in saturated ground both suppress decomposer activity, so dead organic matter piles up over centuries to millennia instead of breaking down. Northern permafrost soils alone are estimated to hold roughly twice as much carbon as the entire atmosphere.

    A patch of wetland is drained for farmland, exposing its waterlogged, carbon-rich soil to oxygen for the first time in centuries. What is the most likely effect on that soil's carbon balance?

    go deeper · live simulator

    Run four real soils, not one generic one

    Pick a real biome, set how much organic matter is going in, then watch 30 years unfold. Underneath, decomposition speed is set by a real number called k, borrowed from actual published decomposition studies, not a made-up scale.

    What k means: k is the share of the stored carbon that breaks down in a year. A higher k means faster decomposition. Real studies put tropical rainforest at k ≈ 4.0/yr, temperate forest at k ≈ 0.3–0.5/yr, and tundra at k ≈ 0.17/yr, which is exactly why warm wet places lose carbon fast and cold wet places don't.

    input soil carbon stock 50% decomposition
    Organic input rate5
    Climate: cold/wet → warm/dryk ≈ 0.55/yr

    Drag right for warmer, wetter conditions. Watch k climb, and decomposition speed up with it.

    year0 / 30
    statestore
    lowest reached50%
    Pick a biome above to begin.
    IB link

    This is 5.1.14, "explain the factors that affect whether a soil is a carbon sink, store or source." Use the words sink, store and source in your answer, and explain your choice using inputs versus decomposition, exactly what the sliders above control.

    k values: global litter decomposition synthesis (Gholz et al. 2000, Journal of Plant Ecology review) and temperate deciduous forest decomposition studies. Model: simplified first-order decay (input minus k × current stock per year), not a full carbon-cycle simulation.

    Sources: this tab
    • Soil texture and its effect on nutrient/water retention and aeration: standard soil science reference figures; illustration by Kaerii, CC BY-SA 4.0.
    • Tropical versus high-latitude/wetland soil carbon distribution: global forest carbon accounting research (soil holds roughly 44% of forest ecosystem carbon on average, but the tropics store most of their carbon in biomass while boreal/permafrost regions store most of theirs in soil).
    • Permafrost carbon roughly twice atmospheric carbon: Arctic carbon cycle research.
    • Decomposition rate constants (k) by biome: Gholz et al. 2000 global litter decomposition synthesis, Journal of Plant Ecology; temperate deciduous forest decomposition studies.
    • IB Environmental Systems and Societies Guide, first assessment 2026, Topic 5, Subtopic 5.1, statements 5.1.12-5.1.14.

    Compare two soils

    Application of skills, statement 5.1.3: sample and compare two subsoils.

    The standard investigation samples two soils from the subsoil, the B horizon, one from a managed environment such as a garden or field, and one from a natural, undisturbed ecosystem. Both samples are then tested for texture, organic matter content, nitrogen/phosphorus/potassium (NPK) concentration, aeration, drainage and water retention, so the two can be compared directly.

    Exam-safe wording

    Sample from the B horizon specifically, not the surface, so that recent surface litter or fertilizer doesn't skew the comparison. Keep every other variable (depth, time of year, sample volume) identical between the two sites, the only thing that should differ is which ecosystem the soil came from.

    One common part of this investigation determines the amount of organic carbon in a dry soil sample by burning off its organic matter and measuring the resulting change in mass. The sample is weighed, heated until only the mineral fraction remains, then weighed again; the mass lost is the organic matter that burned away.

    Try it yourself

    A dry soil sample weighs 42.0 g before burning. After burning off the organic matter, it weighs 38.7 g. Calculate the percentage of the original sample that was organic matter.

    Build a system diagram of the soil ecosystem

    Application of skills, statement 5.1.8: create a systems flow diagram representing the soil system.

    A system diagram sorts every component of a system into three categories: inputs (matter or energy entering the system), processes (what happens to that matter or energy while inside the system), and outputs (matter or energy leaving the system). Sort the seven components below into the category each belongs to for the soil system.

    Input
    Process
    Output
    Exam-safe wording

    When a question asks you to draw or label a system diagram, use arrows for inputs and outputs (crossing the system boundary) and boxes or labels for processes (staying inside it). Getting the direction of the arrows right, in versus out, is usually worth its own mark.

    Glossary

    Every term introduced in this subtopic. Terms marked HL are only required at Higher Level.

    Soil
    A complex mixture of inorganic and organic components, water and air, forming a dynamic system within the larger ecosystem.
    Dynamic system
    A system with its own inputs, outputs, storages and flows, in continuous motion rather than fixed or static.
    Inorganic components
    Mineral matter in soil, rock fragments, sand, silt and clay, produced by weathering of the parent rock.
    Organic components
    Living soil organisms and material from the decay of dead organisms.
    Soil profile
    The stable, layered structure a soil develops over long periods of time, made up of distinct horizons.
    Horizon
    A distinct horizontal layer within a soil profile, distinguished by its composition and appearance.
    Input (soil system)
    Matter entering the soil system, such as dead organic matter, weathered minerals or fertilizer.
    Output (soil system)
    Matter leaving the soil system, such as nutrients absorbed by roots, eroded particles or evaporated water.
    Transfer
    Matter moving into, out of, or across the horizons of a soil without changing what it is, such as infiltration or leaching.
    Transformation
    A process that changes soil components or the soil system itself, such as decomposition or weathering.
    Seed bank
    The reserve of viable seeds present within soil, one of the ways soil supports plant growth.
    Detritivore
    An organism, such as an earthworm, that feeds on dead organic matter and breaks it into smaller fragments.
    Saprotroph
    An organism, such as a fungus or bacterium, that chemically decomposes dead organic matter.
    Biogeochemical cycle
    The cycling of chemical elements between living organisms and the physical environment; soils play a central role in these cycles.
    Soil texture
    The physical make-up of the mineral portion of soil, determined by the relative proportions of sand, silt, clay and humus.
    Humus
    A dark, crumbly substance formed by the partial decay of dead plant material, lying beneath the leaf litter.
    Carbon sink
    A soil (or other system) absorbing more carbon than it releases, so stored carbon increases over time.
    Carbon source
    A soil (or other system) releasing more carbon than it absorbs, so stored carbon decreases over time.
    O horizon HL
    The uppermost organic layer of a soil profile, made up of undecomposed or partially decomposed plant litter.
    A horizon HL
    The layer just beneath the O horizon, rich in organic matter and also known as the mixed layer or topsoil.
    B horizon HL
    The mineral subsoil layer beneath the A horizon, with little organic matter but often rich in leached minerals.
    C horizon HL
    The layer of weathered parent rock beneath the B horizon, not yet broken down into true soil.
    Topsoil HL
    Another name for the A horizon; the most nutrient-rich and biologically active layer, but also the most vulnerable to erosion.
    Cation-exchange capacity (CEC) HL
    A measure of how many positively charged nutrient ions a soil can hold and make available to plants; clay has a far higher CEC than sand.
    Soil texture triangle HL
    A diagram used to classify a soil's exact texture class from its percentages of sand, silt and clay.
    Leaching HL
    The downward movement of dissolved nutrients through soil horizons by percolating water, removing them from the upper layers.
    Parent material HL
    The underlying geological material, rock or sediment, from which a soil's mineral component is derived through weathering.
    Methane clathrate HL
    An ice-like structure trapping methane molecules within underlying geological formations; its breakdown under warming is a potential carbon tipping point.
    Tipping point HL
    A threshold beyond which a system shifts to a substantially different state, sometimes irreversibly.

    Test Yourself is coming soon for this subtopic

    Practice questions and markschemes for this page are still being written. Check back once they have been added.

    5.1.15

    Classifying soils and matching them to biomes

    Soil profile diagrams record the depth, color and character of each horizon, and that record can be used to classify a soil into a type. Because climate and vegetation are two of the strongest controls on how a soil profile develops, each soil type tends to recur under the same biome wherever it forms. Match each soil profile description to the biome it typically forms under.

    Temperate deciduous forest
    Tropical rainforest
    Coniferous forest (taiga)
    Hot desert
    5.1.16 – 5.1.17

    The four soil horizons

    A mature soil profile develops four distinct horizons, each shaped by a different balance of inputs, outputs, transfers and transformations. Click each horizon to see its detail.

    Labeled cross-section of a soil profile showing the O (organic), A (surface), B (subsoil) and C (substratum) horizons above unweathered bedrock, with approximate depths in inches
    A generalized soil profile. Bedrock (R) beneath the C horizon is not itself a horizon; it is the unweathered parent material the horizons above it have formed from. Depths vary enormously between real soils.

    Diagram: US Department of Agriculture, adapted by Hridith Sudev Nambiar and Wilsonbiggs, CC BY-SA 4.0.

    O horizon
    Surface organic layer
    CompositionUndecomposed and partially decomposed plant litter, leaves, twigs and dead organisms.
    DepthA thin surface layer, often just a few centimeters, and sometimes absent altogether where litter is scarce.
    Biological activityWhere fresh decomposition is happening; detritivores and saprotrophs are concentrated here.
    VulnerabilityEasily disturbed or stripped away, since it isn't bound into the mineral soil below.

    The A horizon is also called topsoil; it is the most nutrient-rich and biologically active layer, but also the most vulnerable to erosion, since it sits at the surface once the O horizon is removed or absent.

    5.1.18

    What controls how a soil forms

    Five factors, working together over time, determine what kind of soil forms in a given location: climate, organisms, geomorphology (the shape of the landscape), geology (the parent material) and time itself. Match each scenario below to the factor it illustrates.

    Climate
    Organisms
    Geomorphology
    Geology
    Time
    5.1.19

    Why texture changes soil chemistry

    Sand, silt and clay particles differ enormously in size, and that difference in size drives a difference in surface area. Clay particles are smallest and most numerous per gram, giving them by far the largest surface area, and therefore the most negatively charged sites available to bind positively charged nutrient ions such as calcium, magnesium and potassium. This capacity is called the cation-exchange capacity (CEC). Organic matter adds further exchange sites on top of whatever the mineral texture provides, which is one reason humus-rich soils are so fertile.

    Typical cation-exchange capacity by soil texture Sand 2–16 cmol/kg Silt loam 15–25 cmol/kg Clay 20–50 cmol/kg Organic soil 50–100 cmol/kg
    Typical cation-exchange capacity ranges by texture. Bar length is proportional to the midpoint of each range.

    Why does clay have a much higher cation-exchange capacity than sand, rather than simply holding more water?

    5.1.20

    Using the soil texture triangle

    The soil texture triangle is a ternary diagram: each side represents the percentage of sand, silt or clay in a sample, and the point where all three percentages intersect gives the sample's texture class, for example loam, sandy loam or clay. Use the sand/silt/clay percentages given below to work out each sample's texture class.

    USDA soil texture triangle: a ternary diagram plotting sand, silt and clay percentages against twelve texture classes including sand, loam, silt loam and clay
    The USDA soil texture triangle. Trace a line inward from each axis at the sample's percentage; the class is whichever region all three lines cross.

    Diagram: cmglee and Mikenorton, adapted from US Department of Agriculture data, CC BY-SA 4.0.

    Sample A: 40% sand, 40% silt, 20% clay.

    Sample B: 70% sand, 15% silt, 15% clay.

    Sample C: 10% sand, 20% silt, 70% clay.

    Exam-safe wording

    On the printed diagram itself, trace a line inward from each axis at the given percentage; the texture class is whichever region all three lines intersect inside.

    5.1.21

    Soil carbon release and a possible tipping point

    When decomposition outpaces new organic input, stored soil carbon is released back to the atmosphere, mostly as carbon dioxide. Under some conditions it can instead be released as methane, a gas that traps substantially more heat per molecule than carbon dioxide over short timescales. One proposed mechanism involves methane clathrates, ice-like structures that trap methane within certain geological formations; rising temperatures can, in principle, destabilize these structures and release the trapped methane, a possible climate tipping point: a threshold beyond which a system shifts to a substantially different, and potentially irreversible, state.

    Common misconception

    It's tempting to treat the methane clathrate tipping point as a confirmed, imminent event. It is a real mechanism, but more recent research (including the IPCC's 2021 Sixth Assessment Report) has questioned whether the breakdown would happen abruptly, suggesting a response over centuries to millennia rather than a sudden release. Treat it as a plausible, actively researched risk, not a settled certainty.

    Why is a methane release from soil carbon typically considered more concerning, per unit of carbon released, than a carbon dioxide release of the same size?

    Sources: this tab
    • Soil profile-to-biome associations (brown earths, oxisols, podzols, aridisols): standard soil science and biogeography reference material.
    • Soil horizon diagram: US Department of Agriculture, adapted by Hridith Sudev Nambiar and Wilsonbiggs, CC BY-SA 4.0.
    • Cation-exchange capacity ranges by texture: standard soil science reference figures.
    • USDA soil texture triangle classification system; diagram by cmglee and Mikenorton, CC BY-SA 4.0.
    • Methane clathrate tipping point mechanism and its 2021 IPCC AR6 reassessment: IPCC Sixth Assessment Report, Working Group I.
    • IB Environmental Systems and Societies Guide, first assessment 2026, Topic 5, Subtopic 5.1, statements 5.1.15-5.1.21.